customs.

you wrote about him,
and i write about you,
though, if i were truly
of this age, i would be 
free to think
in nonsexist ways;
i would write about you,
and you would be she:
a woman, forty percent
more than a man.

so say i write about you,
and you are she, 
so then, what have you done 
that i write about you?
you pick the classics 
and their masters
and take prisoner
their good ideas
and several significant novelties
and present a present to society

at which point,
you become a classic novelty,
with more paper liberty
though still confined by stories
of him, of her,
but more of history.
oddly enough, though you be
woman, you carry on history
as if it were your own:
you do not dare, do not dare
disturb the universe.
shantih shantih shantih.

is it true that i cannot write
about you at all?
is this your story, or his after all?
you have said what you meant,
but surely you cannot be sure
that i have heard you say it all:
i do not listen all that well.
i have forgotten who you are.
but, is it not true 
(and tell us the truth):
you have forgotten who you are.

No comments: